Pokemon vs digimon gba

Dating > Pokemon vs digimon gba

Download links: → Pokemon vs digimon gba → Pokemon vs digimon gba

Also the evidence you claim to have is all easily obtainable from wikipedia that anyone can find and is no where near facts you would need to determine the answer to your topic. Oh by the way good try on trying to avoid the statement I made.

Digimon seems to be aimed at an audience two or three years older than the Pokemon audience, addressing more serious themes and using a more complex narrative structure. Current Original Season 2 Overall Episode 57 Season Episode 32 Season Finale Air date December 15th, 2015 Written by Ben Singer Animated by Torrian Crawford Episode link Episode guide Previous Next Season 3 Premiere Pokémon VS Digimon is the 57th episode and Season 2 Finale of DEATH BATTLE! Attempting to say that new Pokemon designs bear a resemblance to old Digimon designs is grasping at straws, and this is because people have moved on. Many introduced to Digimon after the popularity of Pokemon really took off have guessed that, because the two were so similar, Digimon had to be some Pokemon rip-off. Pokémon: These badges represent grass, electricity, fire, rocks, etc — and help you show off your training level, but they are worthless because they don't help your Pokémon do anything. Both of them have had many differnast games come out, made movies and have had a large varity of cards for the trading card game, but in your opinion which one is best. Episodes Each episode of Pokemon follows the travels of different Pokemon trainers. They are digital monsters made of computer data rather than flesh and blood.

Charizard takes flight again and lands multiple Mega Punches on Greymon's head, all with little visible effect. Pokemon has always been about fighting.

Pokemon – Digimon FireRed - Yes it could take a few months but that depends on a lot of things. This is a statement that you yourself contradict in your own post.

That franchise was Digimon. The two franchises were similar enough that it was very difficult to avoid comparing the two. Many did, many claimed that their favorite game was the better of the two, and many heated playground fights and nerd battles broke out. And heated they were. Many introduced to Digimon after the popularity of Pokemon really took off have guessed that, because the two were so similar, Digimon had to be some Pokemon rip-off. Then some started saying that, because the Digimon Tamagotchi Pets came to America first, Pokemon had to have been a rip-off of Digimon. If such a statement were true, it would have been outrageous! It would have meant that Pokemon, for how imaginative it seemed and for how popular it was, would have owed inspiration to some other franchise! How scandalous that would have been! Many have accepted that to have been true, without looking much into it. Even so, Digimon faded into obscurity while Pokemon had a bit of a decline, though Pokemon would later explode into popularity again. However, even today, Digimon fans continue to passionately defend it. Because of this, I decided to do some research to find an answer, and with it perhaps a resolution to so many playground battles. For many people, their introduction to Digimon was to the Digimon anime, Digimon Adventure, which aired in the States beginning August 1999, nearly a year after the debut of the Pokemon anime the previous year. Does that mean that Digimon came first? The question as to which franchise came first cannot be sufficiently answered unless one were to consider their global debuts. To answer the question as to which franchise truly came first, one should know which one was first to debut in any form anywhere in the world. Both Pokemon and Digimon made their debuts in Japan. The first Pokemon product to be released was Pokemon Red and Green for the Game Boy on February 27, 1996. This came way before the Tamagotchi Digimon Virtual Pet. In fact, the Pokemon Anime and Trading Card Game, two well-known facets of the Pokemon franchise, debuted before there would be a Digimon product of any sort. This matter is resolved, right? Sometimes, a Digimon fan may claim that because Digimon was a Tamagotchi, Digimon had to have come first. Thus, Pokemon came before Tamagotchi. Sometimes, someone in a discussion involving Pokemon and Digimon will point out that Godzilla involved monsters fighting. Apparently, the idea in bringing this up is an attempt to defuse the argument by suggesting that they both had to have taken inspiration from something else. However, this is like comparing sea sponges to nitrous oxide. Pokemon and Digimon involve young characters making monsters battle while commanding them to use certain attacks. The Godzilla series involved giant monsters fighting each other, caring little about how many young characters they step on or blow up in the process. Pokemon and Digimon made their debut about 16 months apart, with one of them namely Digimon making obvious changes to emulate the success of the other. Pokemon was originally a fan name for the Pocket Monsters franchise. The Japanese love nicknames and shortening names, and Pokemon was another example of how the Japanese did this. Besides, why would GameFreak want to change the name of their franchise to emulate a less-popular one? A similarity mentioned is the temporary nature of mega evolution, which seems similar to how digimon typically revert to a previous form after a battle in which they digivolve. Cherrim and Castform have been doing it for a while. But at this point, it hardly seems relevant, considering that Digimon has very little media presence anymore, and less popular franchises are scarcely chosen for emulation. That seemed obvious to me for a long time, but the question kept coming up on message boards, so perhaps someone could benefit from seeing it explained here. I went about a week without answering. This makes each of your posts look like one long sentence. The Pokemon game that introduced the green monkey also introduced a blue one and a red one. And look, two games with hundreds of characters with designs based on animals, and they both just happen to have swans in them. Anyone with Google image search can quickly determine this. See how clever I am? You fore I get em to battle until one cloapses and ten year olds can go into the world alone and harness the power of dangerously powerful Pokémon which has massive destructive power. Yet In Digimon the digimon look after the kids and together they defeat the evil forces time and time again so shut up about Pokémon and face the fact that digimon is better okay. I like pokemon and digimon equally, though most of the time I lean towards Digimon because in the anime, unlike Pokemon, the monsters can talk and do their actions for themselves, not having to be told like some slave. Pokemon are kept in pokeballs, prisons for instance, and Digimon freely roam by your side. But, I got the new Digimon game recently and it was better graphics than the threeD pokemon games, and a lot more thought was put into the game. One digimon can digivolve into a total of five different Digimon, and by one, I mean all digimon. So I rest my case, I believe Digimon is better, and can agree that some pokemon are rip offs of Digimon. E: Pokemon and Megami Tensei are different from another in so many ways. Any comparison between the two would likely come down to a similarity in a certain game mechanic. Between Pokemon and Digimon, there are many more similarities, so many wonder whether one directly inspired the other, and if so, which one came before. The question still comes up, which is why I made this entry. Or willing to let this matter go. Attempting to say that new Pokemon designs bear a resemblance to old Digimon designs is grasping at straws, and this is because people have moved on. Some might have seen there as having been a battle between Pokemon and Digimon, but that battle is over. It has been for a long time. They are both a copy of a tyrannosaurus-Rex. And who created that? Digimon made a t-Rex mon? Must be copying the whole fucking evolution line of dinosaurs! Am I fucking right?!!? Because it seems to me, that you think that fucking tyrannomon, and fucking hawkmon, and god damn sparrowmon, have all been came first, before the mother fucking creatures they were based on, came into existence!!! Your just a 12 year old sitting at his moms computer, using cuss words that he learned from South Park to try and prove an in-true point about how your little digishits are better than pokemon!!! Suck on that dude bro. There are differences between the MegaTen and Pokemon, sure. But your post does imply that the core of the Pokemon, gathering monsters and fighting with them against other monsters were invented by it. Single-player RPG where you go around recruiting monsters, gods and demons to fight with your hero character in turn-based combat. I might even look more into it to find more ways in which they may be similar or differ. Digimon, however, has many obvious similarities with Pokemon. Still, both of the series have the main hero usually exploring the world and creating a battle party consisting of monsters that were fought against and then recruited by some means. All this in a Turn Based JRPG wrapper where elemental strengths and weaknesses play a major part in battles. In debates, the burden of proof is usually on the person who is making the claim. Just take my word for it. In fact, children do this all the time. In fact, Pokemon still has something similar to this. What would this have to do with whether Pokemon or Digimon came first as a concept? In this article, I pointed out the dates in which Pokemon and Digimon released their debut products, right down to months and days. If there were any evidence that Digimon has been an idea since before Pokemon has been, the makers of Digimon would have presented it. Even if it means that they make something up. And in the business of anime, manga, and Japanese culture in general, this happens a lot. Adding an element of truthiness to your claims only takes them so far. People notice things like copyright dates and development times, but they have little reason to accept the notion that two very, very similar ideas just happened to simultaneously spring up in the same general area independent of either one influencing another. If one claims that one directly influenced the other, it helps to provide evidence. If you do have a source and they do have some well-documented and verifiable evidence, your case would be stronger if you linked to it. I have a question, have you ever played a digimon game? The whole similarity though is capturing and battling, which can be seen in games older than this. S: Digimon Tamers came out in 1998 in japan. Before anyone states the anime, both the pokemon and digimon animes were non-canon and each character in digimon had only a single digimon unlike pokemon and digimon was more mature as it had death and mortality. Hi wyrvik, You say that the games are nowhere similar at all. This is something that could actually be said when comparing one Digimon game to another. The Digimon games tend to have radically different gameplay mechanics from one installment to another, which risks alienating gamers that may be introduced to it with one particular game. Think about the limitations of a Game Boy game pak. Of course the game would be smaller than most Sega Saturn games. It would pretty much have to be. This is a statement that you yourself contradict in your own post. You mentioned that the first Digimon game was released on the Sega Saturn in 94. S: Digimon Tamers, which was released in September 1998, over 2 years and 6 months after the debut of Pokemon Red and Green. Sometimes, it takes only a few months, especially when the game in question is not substantial in quality. Most Final Fantasy games probably took at least 3 years to develop. On the other hand, we see plenty of rushed-to-market movie-based games that spend just a few months in development because people will want to buy the game after having seen the movie. Many games that owe inspiration to what happens to be popular at the time will be rushed to market, hoping to cash in before interest in the IP dies out. The battle mechanics were button mashing. The Digimon game for Sega Saturn looks 2D to me. As for your statement about the Digimon anime being non-canon, what does that have to do with whether Digimon or Pokemon came first? The reason why there are so many comparisons between Pokemon and Digimon is because they are thematically almost identical. Kids on adventures ordering colorful monsters such as reptiles, bugs and plants of various sizes to use attacks some fire, electric, or air-based etc. Of course comparisons are going to be made. In summary, pointing to the first Digimon game, which came two-and-a-half years after the first Pokemon games, does not make Digimon any more of an original concept. Just to add my look on this crazy thing going on, Pokemon came first yes. Digimon had to take some inspiration from pokemon being it so popular… just because one took inspiration from another, does not make that other one less of a great show…with pokemon being more popular I still like digimon more, simply because the story actually progresses and changes with each season where as pokemon swaps out the non main characters and looks like nobody ages. Another thing worth adding is that every pokemon episode practically has the same template. I grew up watching both but there is a reason why i can still watch digimon to this day and i cant stand pokemon anymore. Yes it could take a few months but that depends on a lot of things. They have new main characters and a new digital world for each season rather than having the same main character with new companions being in different regions of the same world. On the one hand, the creators of Pokemon have produced concept sketches of their original idea, first called Capsule Monsters, which was pitched to Nintendo as early as 1990. On the other hand, the creators of Digimon are yet to produce anything as extant. Or that both are modern in setting and both have nature and technology themes. As for what you said about game development times: thank you for not arguing with me? Sometimes, it only takes a few months, which depends on what went into it. The original Digimon game for Sega Saturn was a simple Tomagotchi sim with a Windows interface and practically no 3D graphics. Something like that could easily have passed for an abandoned fan project. After something as deep and addictive as Pokemon Red and Green, Digital Monster Ver. S was like bringing Kool Aid to a wine-tasting party. Digimon was the most blatant attempt to do this. While it is true that Digimon originated as Tamagotchi pets, Tamagotchi pets are distinct from Digimon. Tamagotchi largely served as the platform on which Digimon made its debut. The first Tamagotchi was released on November 23, 1996, nearly 9 months after the release of Pokemon Red and Green. One of the most noticeable differences between seasons is in the cast of characters. Fucking oath Pokemon copied mega evolutions from mega digivolutions. But Digimon wins in the anime department. Really I tried watching the first episode and I practically fell asleep. How they did the human digimon, the x-fusions, and human x-fusions, that was pretty cool. Not only did they do all this, but had the courage, friendship, knowledge, serenity, love, reliability, hope and light for Digimon adventure and Digimon 02. You mentioned the importance of examining the franchises on international levels and Digimon has always been quite popular in Asia, namely Japan. There have been several television series and movies as well as cards and a bunch of video games. Digimon started out as a virtual pet; something cute. Pokemon has always been about fighting. Well to be frank no one ripped anyone. Both are original concepts where one happen in real world while other in a digital world. Comparing them is like comparing Anime With Marvel or DC. Well both have different genres one being supernatural other being sci-fi. So lets respect both the anime. Is it really so hard to believe that two very similar ideas showed up within a couple years of each other, in the same part of the world, are aesthetically almost identical, and target the same demographic? What grinds my gears is when someone not only denies that they took inspiration, but claims that the original stole from them. In the case of Digimon, this is more a problem with the fans than it is with the IP itself. That is why I wanted to write this article. This could not have been accomplished by attributing coincidental similarity. Such an explanation would not even be satisfactory, and it would not stand in a world where there are people willing to dig deep to find the truth of matters. It was meant to be too obvious. I am not trying to hide a valid point to my argument that make it useless and unvalid. But it seems like you enjoy to argue with other people, which is fine. People like to win that is nature, but like I said if you are not able to understand that concept that is your problem, not mine. Oh by the way good try on trying to avoid the statement I made. Talk to the original creators to close this argument. If you really wanted to answer this post it is best to remain unbiased and to truly remain unbiased towards your forum topic you must not know either before creating an article that is not only comparing both but also is controversial among the fans. Just by going to your page there are plenty of Pokemon articles you have created which in turn is one is one way to see your bias on this topic. I personally would believe a person that is unbiased than a person that is biased from the start. Also the evidence you claim to have is all easily obtainable from wikipedia that anyone can find and is no where near facts you would need to determine the answer to your topic. Anyone can look up these facts for themselves but you have to also realize that when a game is released to the public is not the start of that game. Games have many stages of development and for both Pokemon and Digimon they both had to start off as an idea. The idea that eventually was turned into paper and also sketches which would later go on to become a game and much more than that. Now if said evidence does come to light of early ideas on paper and early sketches that date when the Pokemon and Digimon were started that would then determine the true answer to this long argument. I do say you did a good job of providing facts for this forum on both subjects, just try not to be biased about it and also it would better to say that the true answer cannot be determined at this time till all the evidence comes forward in the future. Just look at the sonic series for example. The series creator Yuji Naka admitted that he loves mario and that he drew inspiration from the games to create sonic. He would always try to make it to the end of the levels as fast as he could. Now Sonic is a character and icon known throughout the world and has two games coming out very soon Sonic Mania and Sonic forces. Granted even you guys have to admit that even Sonic seems more culturally significant today than Digimon. Also why does it matter to people so much who came first. I think the evidence is strong enough to suggest that the idea of pokemon originally called capsule monsters with concept art as early as 1990 note this is 7 years before anything Digimon or Digimon related was in existence came first. This does not make Digimon any less of a franchise. It just means that it came first. Also why is it so crazy that some aspects of Digimon come from Pokemon. Pokemon has always been a popular series, even way back then. But you know none of this information has affected my like of both franchises. Pokemon is great and Digimon is great. Digimon took whatever aspects it borrowed from Pokemon and became its own thing. This is nothing to angry over. But this is just because I like both games equally. Though they range to different audiences. For those who are into e for everyone games, Pokemon is for you, it may be a kids game but it is addictive. And if you prefer games that have some cursing and actually have the voices of characters, the newer Digimon games are for you. So what if seome Digimon look like pokemon from the past, the universes and appearances are vastly different. In Digimon the monsters are literally decked out with be it clothing, different appearances, guns, anything you can think of! And Pokemon has gyms where you can level up Pokemon more easily. So in my view, Both of them should be considered as equals.